Login or Register to make a submission.

As part of the submission process, authors are required to confirm that their submission complies with all of the following guidelines. Submissions that do not adhere to these requirements may be returned to the authors for revision.

  • The manuscript is unpublished and has not been submitted for publication elsewhere.
  • The submitted file is in Microsoft Word, OpenOffice, or RTF format.
  • The text must have single line spacing, use a 12-point font, and employ italics rather than underlining (except for URLs). All illustrations, figures, and tables must be properly placed within the document, not at the end.
  • The article must meet all the requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines section of the "About the Journal" page.

Originality of the Work, Languages of Publication, and Evaluation Process

Any work submitted for publication in Interaction must align with the journal’s editorial focus and adhere to the established publishing guidelines.

The journal accepts submissions in Indonesian (only if the author is from Indonesia) and English.

Interaction only publishes original works. Submitted articles must not have been previously published or be under review in another journal. In certain cases, the Editorial Committee may recommend translating an article that has been published elsewhere if it is considered academically significant.

All submitted articles will undergo a blind peer review process by reviewers appointed by the Editorial Committee.

Interaction also accepts academic essays, provided they offer in-depth theoretical reflections from academics and researchers. These essays must contribute new knowledge to the analysis of social interaction, communication, and media studies. Manuscripts should be between 4,000 and 6,000 words, well-structured, and properly referenced.


Blind Peer Review Process

Interaction implements a blind peer review system for all submitted manuscripts. This process aims to ensure high academic quality and provide constructive feedback to authors.

Evaluation Stages

The evaluation process takes approximately three months and includes the following stages:

  1. Manuscript submission via the journal platform. Authors must complete all required information before proceeding.

  2. Initial screening by the Editorial Board, which may result in:

    • Rejection if the manuscript does not meet the journal’s thematic and formatting criteria.

    • Proceeding to the review stage, where external reviewers are assigned.

  3. Notification to the author regarding the decision from stage 2.

  4. Evaluation of the manuscript by external reviewers within 20 days.

  5. Reviewers submit evaluation results to the journal management.

  6. Notification to the author of the evaluation results.

Authors will receive qualitative feedback containing comments and suggestions for improvement, along with quantitative assessments of their articles.

To improve their evaluation score, authors may resubmit their manuscript as many times as needed, provided it has passed the initial screening stage.


Formal Criteria

All manuscripts submitted to Interaction must include the following elements:

  • Title (written in the original language and English).

  • Author details: Full name, academic/professional affiliation, mailing address, and email. Affiliations must follow standard guidelines.

  • ORCID identifier (if available).

  • Abstract (150-250 words) summarizing the main aspects and findings of the research.

  • Keywords (at least 3 keywords).

  • Main body of the article, structured into sections and subsections.

  • References following the American Psychological Association (APA) 7th edition standard, using reference management tools like Mendeley or Zotero.

Manuscripts should not exceed 6,000 words, including abstracts, footnotes, and references.

Self-citation (citing one’s own work) or citing articles previously published in Interaction should not exceed 20% of the total references.

Tables, figures, and graphs must be numbered and clearly labeled, and referenced within the main text. Tables should be labeled using Roman numerals (Table I), while figures and graphs should use Arabic numerals (Figure 1).


Bibliographic References

Authors must ensure that all references are checked against CrossRef to include Digital Object Identifiers (DOI) if available.

Example Reference Formats

a) Books
Castells, M. (1997). The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Madrid: Alianza.

b) Book Chapters
Baym, N. K. (1998). The emergence of online communities. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 35-68). Sage Publications.

c) Journal Articles
Coll, C. (2004). Educational psychology and ICT-mediated learning practices: A constructivist perspective. Sinéctica, 25(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/xxxxx

d) Electronic Documents
Trénel, M. (2004). Measuring the quality of online deliberation: Coding scheme 2.4 [Online document]. Social Science Research Center. Retrieved June 6, 2005, from https://www.example.com


Research and Dissertation Review Section

This section features reviews of recent research, including master’s theses, doctoral dissertations, and other academic studies. The goal is to disseminate cutting-edge research trends in communication and sociology while encouraging critical reflection on academic contributions.

These reviews do not merely summarize research methodology and key findings but also provide an analysis of research novelty, how the study enriches existing literature, and its potential impact on the development of knowledge.

Articles in this section can be submitted by thesis/dissertation authors, researchers, or Editorial Board members. Manuscripts must still meet academic standards and reflect a substantial contribution to the field.

Research and dissertation reviews do not go through a peer review process or regular indexing but will be periodically updated on the journal’s website to enhance accessibility and academic discussion.